David Petraeus Explains How World War III Begins

David Petraeus used to run the CIA.

The Guardian:

“The US and its allies would destroy Russia’s troops and equipment in Ukraine – as well as sink its Black Sea fleet – if the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, uses nuclear weapons in thecountry, former CIA director and retired four-star army general David Petraeus warned on Sunday.

Petraeus said that he had not spoken to national security adviser Jake Sullivan on the likely US response to nuclear escalation from Russia, which administration officials have said has been repeatedly communicated to Moscow.

He told ABC News: “Just to give you a hypothetical, we would respond by leading a Nato – a collective – effort that would take out every Russian conventional force that we can see and identify on the battlefield in Ukraine and also in Crimea and every ship in the Black Sea.” …”

If the Democrats hold Congress in the midterms and continue to flood an endless supply of weapons into Ukraine for the next two years, which could provoke a desperate Putin to use nuclear weapons on the battlefield, this is where this is going. These people are eager to start a nuclear war with Russia.

In the 2020 election, I underestimated the possibility that Russiagaters would use a Biden presidency to start a war with Russia. Last year, I also didn’t anticipate a major war would break out. I have underestimated the recklessness and foolishness of these bloodthirsty people. I am going to take them at their word this year that they are looking for any excuse to get into a hot war with Russia.


  1. According to those who have served with the general, he has an unfortunate history of averring things that turn out to be not worthy of having been averred.

    That said, if this is an exception to this, we can all kiss Christmas goodbye … forever.

  2. Ironically, we are probably closer to nuclear WWIII now than at any time during the Cold War. General Betrayus and his band of evil, psychopathic bastards.The funniest thing about the Ukraine war is Anti-Whites pretending to care about Whites.

  3. This is definitely now a NATO vs. Russia war. It’s one of the reasons that Russia is currently losing the war. NATO is flooding Ukraine with everything it needs including a flood of foreign fighters. Some estimates are that the counter-offensives in the South and East are 2/3 foreign fighters. NATO is assisting the targeting of Russian troops/equipment with highly accurate satellite steering data. Russian troops are definitely are the run and they’ve lost a vast amount of tanks/other vehicles.

    In addition, the vaunted Russian air superiority might be overrated. Much of Ukraines Anti-Aircraft Systems were supposedly taken out earlier in the conflict but Russia continues to lose aircraft to existing systems and foreign supplied MANPADS. Russian aircraft are top notch but the training of their pilots for combat does not match the training of the pilots in the West. The air superiority potential exists but that reality isn’t manifesting currently.

    No matter how strong and manly Russian soldiers are it doesn’t take much more than a weak homosexual British or American transexual Navy/Air Force member to use satellite reconnaissance and steering data to obliterate Russian tanks with HIMARS missiles fired by Ukros. And that is happening and decimating Russian troops.

    Currently, Russians remind me of Republicans and NATO is Antifa/BLM/FBI.

    Ukros are committing mass terrorist bombings of civilians in disputed regions and those fleeing the conflict towards Russia/safe zones. Ukros are also mass murdering Russian POW’s in violation of international law.

    Russia seems to want to follow international rules of war but that’s not working so well. Putin is being lambasted across many spheres of punditry for being soft. If Russia continues to lose he actually might be removed from power and the hardline replacements might actually use some type of nuclear weapon to strike a decisive blow and all hell could break loose.

    Stay tuned…….

      • @Captain John…

        I agree.

        There is undoubtedly a LGBTQ aspect to this conflagration,, because the people who run the West cannot countenance someone who will not validate their sexual sin, or accept the system they wish to put on the world to make it alright.

        Things is – it’s not alright, nor will it ever be.

        Good on Vladimirovka for telling them where they get off.

        I’m only too sorry he is not the Republican candidate for president.

  4. I watched the UN Security Council meeting in its entirety. The Russian ambassador methodically presented their case for US responsibility. Admittedly, it was circumstantial and I’m not even claiming that it proves their case. But it made specific points that are already known to be true or could be proven true or false by an objective investigation. By contrast, the US (and UK) ambassadors replied with sarcasm and charges of “disinformation” and “conspiracy theories”. While a political appointee might be expected to make such an unprofessional presentation, this guy was apparently a career State Dept. official which is particularly disturbing.

    I am astounded at all the mental gymnastics performed by all the analysts pointing to Russia as the culprit. And that seems to be all you’ll find in the western media. I looked at PBS Newshour coverage thinking that they have an hour to cover the news uninterrupted by drug commercials. Scarce coverage and only “Russia did it”.

    Why would Russia chose to attack its own pipeline in the section which lies in the exclusive economic zone of NATO members Denmark and Sweden, which gives them control of the crime scene as well as the subsequent investigation?

  5. The Southern and Western states currently being help captive in the Yankee Empire (USA) should announce immediately that they will secede at the same instant these conquer-the-world Yankee fanatics finally goad Russia into a hot war. These war mongers are on Russia’s border as the Soviets were in Cuba 60 years ago forcing the Yankee Empire to take military action. To threaten Russia by moving right up on its border has been their objective all along. They are the aggressors. They are the ones who want to conquer the world and spread satanism, homosexuality, gender nonsense, etc etc and basically turn every human being into a demonic dog only fit to be thrown into the lake of fire.

    Don’t hold back, Putin, nuke this satanic tranny-brained Yankee Empire while you still have the chance and keep nuking it until you wipe this only-nation-evil-enough-to-drop-nukes-on-civilian-cities just so they could test their new nuclear toy before WWII was over and would have deprived them of the opportunity…wipe them off the face of the earth. Make all of their Yankee cities look like dead flattened bombed-out Hiroshima and Nagasaki Japan. They deserve it! You will do humanity a favor!

    Secede now!

    May God Save the South!

  6. I’m betting the CIA pulls a false flag in Ukraine using tactical nukes and blames Russia and that’s how the hot war will begin.

  7. If the Republicucks win this November that is no guarantee that funding for the Ukraine will be reduced or discontinued. It can always be included in an off-the-books budget or hidden inside of other spending packages. Petraeus has no credibility, he talks tough but Putin is a master chess player. Unlike ZOG officials Vladimir Vladimirovitch never raises his voice or loses his cool.

  8. The first use of a nuclear weapon since WW II is not just any excuse. Such a brazen and uncalled (not an inch of internationally recognized Russia is threathened) move by Russia requires a forceful response from the civilized world. It is dissapointing to see such a large part of the hard right demand we just roll over to the Russians. This confrontation cannot be compared to senseless wars of choice like in Afghanistan, Iraq or Libya. This time it really matters.

    • What exactly is at stake here?

      The fate of Donbas? Why is that our problem? Why is that worth getting into a nuclear war with Russia for someone who lives on the other side of the world in the Western hemisphere?

      • We already got uneccessarily involved in two world wars that were none of our business, along with those debacles in Vietnam and the Middle East. Meanwhile the US border with Mexico is wide open.

        Serious question: Are you afraid of your brown grandkids?

    • “It is disappointing to see such a large part of the hard right demand we just roll over to the Russians. This confrontation cannot be compared to senseless wars of choice like in Afghanistan, Iraq or Libya” – It’s not a matter of “rolling over to the Russians,” but in recognizing that the U.S. has no vital interests in what is essentially a regional conflict between Russia and Ukraine.

      Much of the “hard right” sides with Putin because his protracted complaints about what Ukraine is doing to many Russians in the Donbas region have gone unheeded. Putin is right about not having a NATO military buildup on his border. It would leave Russia completely vulnerable to missel attacks. Would the U.S. accept an Iranian or a North Korean military buildup on our southern border if Mexico welcomed them? Of course not. Somehow the same logic is not applied by many when it comes to a NATO military buildup on Ukraine’s border.

      U.S. involvement in Ukraine is indeed another example of a “senseless war,” although this time it’s even worse than the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts because of the real potential of a nuclear war.

      Not only is there a good chance of a nuclear war between the U.S. and Russia, but as usual, thousands of young American soldiers and marines will pay the price for our elected leaders’ arrogance and lunacy.

      Sometimes I can’t believe the warmongering rhetoric of our dementia-ridden president and his many cohorts. Where are all the peace protesters railing against war? Why isn’t every other nation in the world stepping in to stop this insanity? Why aren’t the American people up in arms over what our president and congress are getting us into?

      “Those whom the gods would destroy they first make mad” – Euripides

    • @ VanSpeyk — it’s hard to believe that so many American normies still don’t get it, and get all their “information” from FOXjews. America is lost because of dopes like you!

      Wasn’t it in 2014 the legitimately elected government in the Ukraine was overthrown by the jew run US State Department in a coup? Why yes! They these jews started flooding the place with gay sex, feminism, and brown immigration just as the jews have done here in our American homeland. The jews took complete control of the Ukraine gov and funded satanic neo-Nazi gangs to slaughter ethnic Russians, some 14,000 innocent people living in the Eastern Provinces of Dombass and Donetsk. Highlighting the corrupt nature of the jew run Ukraine gov, Vladimir Zelensky, ran on the platform of upholding the Minsk agreements and ending the civil war that started after the US financed illegal 2014 coup in Kiev. 73% of Ukrainians voted for him based on that lie. The US gov claims to be fighting for “democracy,” but anyone can look at the Ukraine and see that it is run by a jewish puppet, installed via an illegal Western-backed coup, who was given tens of millions of dollars by a jewish oligarch – the same jewish oligarch who established these bizarre satanic neo-Nazi death cults that have been waging total war against Russians in the Ukraine for 8 years.

  9. What a pitiful cuck David Petraeus is. Wasn’t he the one who had an affair with a reporter in Afghanistan and she often physically challenged him in running and in pushups? Yes, of course. Her name was Paula Broadwell. She’s a little hard looking, and if you take off her makeup it’s all downhill from there.

    Still, any woman who physically challenges a male in terms of strength is not the kind of woman who wants to humbly submit to his leadership, have babies, and be a homemaker. She used Petraeus for all the information she needed for her article, and later exposed the affair in an interview. After all, she’s a ‘career woman.’ Broadwell even wrote a book about it. Isn’t she a wonderful gal?

    I doubt Petraeus looked at her as some momentary fling since Broadwell was infinitely more attractive than his dumpy wife. Who knows, he might have left her for the muscular Broadwell? He was quite enamored with her.

    Whatever the case, foolish men like David Petraeus will be more than glad to get the U.S. into another world war so as to please Judeo-Bolshevik overlords. He’s just a tool of our government’s warmongering system.

    • >She’s a little hard looking, and if you take off her makeup it’s all downhill from there.

      Have you seen Petraeus’ wife? — link — scroll down: another American woman who just let herself go pear-shaped — that in part explains the liaison with Broadwell.

      To me Petraeus always appeared to be typical of the type who rises thru the management ranks at many bureaucracies (the military is in part a bureaucracy) — I’ve seen it over and over again.

  10. Why is NATO getting involved to help Ukraine hold onto provinces whose inhabitants are Russian ethnics being persecuted by Ukraine’s ethnics – not that I can tell them apart. The Russian and the Ukrainian Olympic competitors were both Eastern Slavs that looked more like brothers from the same mother than two completely different ethno-nationals.

    Where is it in the American interest to decide which regions can separate from the other? Ukraine itself separated from Russia, so why didn’t an alleged “peace-keeping” force like NATO or, at least the United Nations. demand that the people in the disputed regions be allowed to vote to exit or remain Ukraine in a referendum and then let them live with their decision?

    Assuming that even a significant size minority in the disputed areas wanted to remain Ukrainian, it would have still cost the NATO members a lot less in blood and treasure to help them remove and relocate comfortably to within the Ukraine’s new boundaries.

    The Czech and Slovak Republics were once Czechoslavakia. The Czechs invited the Slovaks to keep as was, but they didn’t want to. The Czechs let the Slovaks go without any fuss. Mind you, the Slovaks regretted it and asked to return, but the Czechs found that they were better off without them and refused.

    Poland and Lithuania were once one empire. Poland made and Lithuania refused the same chance to leave as was. Poland let them go and they both got along just fine. I don’t know what made the Poles dig in their heels over Danzig/Gdansk. I suspect outside French and British agitators. whipping up the old Slav-Teuton feuds. And I suspect any Polish leadership willing to be logical met untimely ends, just like those leaders that crashed when they were headed for a meeting with Russia. But had the Polish people not wanted to keep ethno-nationals that would never feel Polish as part of Poland, a lot more people would have survived WWII in Central Europe and the Europeans would have enjoyed more freedom and autonomy, not been forced and kept under the thumb of either the USA or the USSR.

    In any case, I have never seen a stronger case of hubris than exists in what passes as our leadership. I guess they want to test-drive those underground nuclear bunker cities they constructed using our tax dollars?

    I’m at the point where I detest them to the point that I vew going up in a mushroom cloud far more preferable than dealing with them, their arrogance, their self-righteous idiocy and incompetent antics a single second longer than I have to.

  11. Sixty years ago when the Yankee Empire (USA) had the Soviets 90 miles off their border preparing to deploy nukes was Kennedy cornered, trapped, might resort to a nuclear war?

    Cuban Missile Crisis

    The Cuban Missile Crisis, also known as the October Crisis of 1962 (Spanish: Crisis de Octubre), the Caribbean Crisis (Russian: ????????? ??????, tr. Karibsky krizis, IPA: [k??r?ipsk??j ?kr?iz??s]), or the Missile Scare, was a 1-month, 4 day (16 October – 20 November 1962) confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union which escalated into an international crisis when American deployments of missiles in Italy and Turkey were matched by Soviet deployments of similar ballistic missiles in Cuba. Despite the short time frame, the Cuban Missile Crisis remains a defining moment in U.S. national security and nuclear war preparation. The confrontation is often considered the closest the Cold War came to escalating into a full-scale nuclear war.

    In response to the presence of American Jupiter ballistic missiles in Italy and Turkey, and the failed Bay of Pigs Invasion of 1961, Soviet First Secretary Nikita Khrushchev agreed to Cuba’s request to place nuclear missiles on the island to deter a future invasion. An agreement was reached during a secret meeting between Khrushchev and Cuban Prime Minister Fidel Castro in July 1962, and construction of a number of missile launch facilities started later that summer.

    Meanwhile, the 1962 United States elections were under way, and the White House denied charges for months that it was ignoring dangerous Soviet missiles 90 mi (140 km) from Florida. The missile preparations were confirmed when an Air Force U-2 spy plane produced clear photographic evidence of medium-range R-12 (NATO code name SS-4) and intermediate-range R-14 (NATO code name SS-5) ballistic missile facilities.

    When this was reported to President John F. Kennedy, he then convened a meeting of the nine members of the National Security Council and five other key advisers in a group that became known as the Executive Committee of the National Security Council (EXCOMM). During this meeting, President Kennedy was originally advised to carry out an air strike on Cuban soil in order to compromise Soviet missile supplies, followed by an invasion of the Cuban mainland. After careful consideration, President Kennedy chose a less aggressive course of action to avoid a declaration of war. After consultation with them, Kennedy ordered a naval “quarantine” on October 22 to prevent further missiles from reaching Cuba. By using the term “quarantine” rather than “blockade” (an act of war by legal definition), the United States was able to avoid the implications of a state of war. The US announced it would not permit offensive weapons to be delivered to Cuba and demanded that the weapons already in Cuba be dismantled and returned to the Soviet Union…
    — Wikipedia, “Cuban Missile Crisis”

    Maybe Putin ought to deploy nukes in Cuba in 2022 since the Yankee Empire has no problem moving all kinds of their weapons systems up on Russia’s border. I am sure the Yanks would welcome him over here in their backyard….NOT.

    Yankee hypocrisy — when and where have we seen this before?


    You and NATO are fighting a proxy war against Russia, you pack of demonic liars who practice satanism and destroyed the South 160 years ago.

2 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Tucker Carlson: Who Sabotaged the Nord Stream Pipelines? – Occidental Dissent
  2. Leon Panetta: If Putin Uses Nukes in Ukraine, the U.S. Must Respond With Military Force – Occidental Dissent

Comments are closed.