Note: Who can blame the opposition for laughing at this? I’m laughing at it too. I don’t even know what these people are arguing about half the time.
Comments are closed.
Copyright © 2024 | WordPress Theme by MH Themes
Note: Who can blame the opposition for laughing at this? I’m laughing at it too. I don’t even know what these people are arguing about half the time.
Comments are closed.
Copyright © 2024 | WordPress Theme by MH Themes
Fr. John seems to think Hitler is the way to go. Really?! The man was a queer, and he had some Berber and Jewish ancestry, which is taboo for Fr. John. And he was basically a pagan religiously, and was Anti-Christian, so I don’t understand why any professing Christian would want to look up to Hitler.
As for the protesters in Ferguson doing the “naming”, that might be an indication of Muslim activity in that town. http://www.shoebat.com/ has several articles showing that Muslims are active in black communities. So naturally the Muslim agitators would do the naming to stir up the pot.
Daily Stormer thread:
http://www.dailystormer.com/splc-addresses-infinite-dramaquest/
Anglin’s right about the Sperg lords taking themselves way too seriously. The DragonBallZ playing cards was very funny and injected some much needed levity into the debate.
Wow! Brad is a smart one! I wonder if Brad knows what libel is? He might want to look that up, and then remove all of the information implicating himself along with a few others. That would be my advice. Me wonders if anyone’s actually matched the voices? You know, the one from the recording of the episode where Taafe called Oprah the N-word with the person you claim to be me? I’m positive it would only take a few seconds of time and a phone call for you to realize just how stupid you really are. I do believe there’s a link to the audio on my blog. Now you run along now back to the sandbox and play with the ankle biters little feller. Go on. Git.
Folks, if that was my name, do you really think I’d post under it? Like I said, two minutes time would prove that Brad doesn’t know the first thing he is talking about. Srsly Brad. I’d scrub all of this quick if I was you. Not that it matters, we’re all backed up on our end. I have to thank you though for confirming what was already suspected.
I heard about these rumors on Stormfront in September, but I haven’t been able to confirm them.
A few points:
1.) How else would The White Voice have connected Spelunker to Jacob Elijah deNobel unless the story about him calling in with the Google voice number is true? There’s no other possible path to that conclusion.
2.) I found out about Spelunker posting as “Jacob” on the SPLC Hatewatch blog before I stumbled across the Stormfront post where he was outed as Jacob Elijah deNobel. In fact, that’s how I found it by Googling around for “Jacob + spe-lunk-ing.”
3.) Take a look at Jacob deNobel’s background: he was involved with the White Anti-Racist Student Association at Ithaca, he majored in journalism, his interests are “social justice,” he tweets about Ida B. Wells, he edited a journal about race and white privilege, he worked for a homosexual website called Edge, he’s in his mid-twenties, he lives in Westminster, Maryland, and Spelunker’s IP address just happens to resolve to that area. That’s an awful lot of coincidences!
4.) Assuming Spelunker isn’t Jacob deNobel, it would be a marvelous coincidence that someone else just like him in his own geographic area was trolling an obscure radio network, on that particular day, to listen to an even more obscure show on that radio network, and some other “Jacob” was pimping his blog on the SPLC website.
5.) BTW, I know for a fact that Spelunker is “Larry Jacobs” on Facebook.
“Naming the Jew” boils down to understanding that Jews are a different people with different interests from whites, that Jews have a long history of extreme hostility to whites, and — most importantly — that the organized Jewish community is the primary political impediment to whites regaining control of our destinies.
What next? At the very minimum, you have to take stock of your personal and political affiliations, then distance yourself from Jews. Since nothing less than the survival of our race is at stake, we really can’t afford to have political organizations that do not understand the Jewish threat and, therefore, exclude Jews — all Jews, even nice Jews, even Jews that claim to be sympathetic (because that is what any Jewish infiltrator would say).
If the CofCC and the LOS do not exclude Jews (openly or secretly), then they really are not serious movements, in the sense that they do not take seriously the threat to white survival, the enmity of the Jewish community, and the necessity of not wasting another 50+ years with more ineffectual buffoonery.
Re: Greg
1.) The Jew is named hundreds of times, maybe thousands of times, every single day. There’s hardly a day that goes by in which I don’t see the Jew named online. The Jew has been named millions of times over the past 13 years. There’s never been any shortage of naming the Jew.
2.) Jews can pretend to be anyone and cause as much chaos as possible under the cloak of anonymity on the internet. In real life, they are under much greater scrutiny, and I rarely see them except at Amren conferences. Does the survival of the White race hinge on stopping Jewamongyou at the entrance to Montgomery Bell State Park?
3.) In over 20 years, neither the CofCC or the League has ever had a problem with Jewish sabotage. These hypothetical Jews are too busy trolling the internet for lulz to join real world organizations.
4.) Can anyone be taken seriously who won’t show his face in public or be seen outside his own house?
Look how this guy squirms when someone posts his info. lol
Re: Shotgun
When this information first came to light on Crossroads, he panicked and within five minutes had posted a hysterical blog entry on his website, which was subsequently deleted.
If anyone wants to contact Jacob Elijah deNobel at The Carroll County Times to ask about these allegations that he is Spelunker, he can be reached at 410-857-7890 or at jacob.denobel@carrollcountytimes.com.
http://touch.carrollcountytimes.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-81104301/
I wonder if you know, you hysterical twit. Jacob Elijah deNobel is an anti-racist activist – if only that could ruin a man’s reputation.
If Spelunker is being libeled, why hasn’t a court ordered the removal of the information from Stormfront, where it has already been posted three times? It hasn’t been removed because a.) he hasn’t tried or b.) because it is true. Probably both.
Also, what are the chances that someone just like Spelunker was trolling Frank Taafe on The White Voice, on that particular night, and called in from the same area in Maryland? Highly unlikely.
Who said I’m being libeled? You’re under the assumption you know who I am.
I’m going to make popcorn.
I don’t know all of the history with this Spelunker fellow, but it bothers me on some level that you are revealing his personal information. The progressive left engages in this type of behavior all of the time in order to dissuade those of us on the dissident right from engaging in political activity. In today’s America, there are consequences for holding the beliefs that we do. If Spelunker is one of those anti-racists who delights in exposing the identities of activists, then as a matter of principle he deserves to be exposed himself. However, if not then he should have his privacy protected just like all of us.
Spelunker is one of those people who tries to expose the identities of our activists on his blog. He forfeited his privacy a long time ago.
If you’re not Jacob, then why would you advise Hunter to “scrub all this quick”? Surely it’d serve your purposes to see Hunter get himself into as much legal hot water as possible. (Not that anything he’s said here implicates him in any illegal behavior, though.)
Awful lot of assumptions being made. Therein lies the problem.
Brads phone works. So why is he waiting for someone else to make a call?
Why not just talk about it in real life?
Oooops, popcorn’s ready. Catch y’all later.
It depends on the circumstances. Considering the stigma and ostracizing that goes with being pro-White and a seeker of unfettered truth, I would have to say Yes.
Conversely, is someone supposed to be taken seriously just because they show their face?
Why would an anti-racist try and hide their identity?
He’s made it personal by trolling and antagonizing countless people on the internet.
I thought Spelunker was the old fat black guy who brought all those freaks out to protest the AmRen conference.
That’s Daryle Lamont Jenkins of One People’s Project.
Thanks for the updates. I agree that Spunksplatter made it a personal crusade to “out” or otherwise harm those in any movement he doesn’t agree with . That makes him fair game. He’s hiding his identity because actions have consequences.
On the other hand, I myself must remain anonymous to all but a few chosen contacts I have met. Just merely associating with certain folks that are conservative, traditional, Christian or labeled racists is enough to get one fired these days. That is why I support what HW is doing & why I have hope for the future.
Thank you HW from the bottom of my heart.
CT: “Why would an anti-racist try and hide their identity?”
Because if White people realize that the “anti-racist” replacists are Jews, it could start an anti-Jewish reaction.
He’s hiding his identity because he is afraid someone might kick his ass.
IMO, the fear is not unjustified. He’s antagonized enough people by being such an asshole that someone out there might feel that taking the charge is worth the satisfaction of putting him in his place. That’s why I didn’t release this information sooner.
I can’t say with absolute certainty that it is him, but I find it highly probable on the basis of the evidence. Stormfront outed him again yesterday and someone was trolling him here by posting as Jacob deNobel last night.
It was bound to come out sooner or later.
He certainly appears to be a queer.
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/jacob-denobel/34/9a1/9
Theater Reviewer
Edge
June 2011 – August 2011 (3 months)
Wrote theater reviews for leading online LGBT magazine.
Editor/Web Designer
IC Journal for Race, Culture, Gender and Ethnicity
September 2010 – May 2011 (9 months)
Vetted and edited submissions to undergraduate academic journal and designed and coded website for marketing.
Education
Ithaca College
Ithaca College
Bachelor of Arts, Journalism
2007 – 2011
Activities and Societies: Sustainable Housing Program, White Student Anti-Racist Network
You’re just insecure, Hunter.
There’s a surfeit of “naming the Jew” on the internet … as proof of this, I submit the following line of evidence:
http://www.democratic-republicans.us/english/english-mind-blowing-video-series-earths-war-with-pleiadians-opposing-grays-and-reptilians
Listen to this guy:
Linder hasn’t been seen in public outside his own house all year. Is that due to Jews or his own choices?
Nugent seems to become more neurotic and out of touch with reality the more he writes. I almost feel embarrassed for the guy. I wonder why it is that he’s impervious to the same chemtrails that we are all exposed to.
Your line of reasoning goes along the clasic liberal/libertarian lines: “Muh big (federal) government, “muh civil rights” etc. Your disgusting condescending behavior also points to a liberal.
I think the best shills are those who dont even know what they are shilling for. Or maybe you simply dont know what liberalism is.
And I have pointed out a couple of times that this itself is deficient, not enough, bc it would leave intact the rest of the colums of jew power: banks and corporations and media empires.
You are totally talking about something else. Restoring the gay marriage ban in our situation wouldn’t accomplish anything of significance. You are focused on microscopic issues. The jews are able to destroy us with the gay marriage ban in effect, if there is no way to enable it, doesnt change a thing.
Focusing on legalistic arguments shows more than anything that you are a liberal.
No, you fucking haven’t. You describes a situation, which has nothing to do with actual intentions. Let me ly out for you in the simples of terms imaginable:
Just because you have the right to sanction something, doesnt actually mean that you want to or will sanction it eventually.
What guarantees that the seceded states will use their rights to strip the jews from their economic and media-influence? We are talking about a lot of things that have to be eliminated. Of course, nothing guarantees it, its just an unproven assumption on your part, in other words: bullshit.
What guarantees that the states will restore all of these bans? Is that even feasible? Is there even a serious determination in the Southern politicians or the Southern public to restore these things, every single one of them? I highly doubt it, and you dont have any data to prove it.
It doesnt matter the slightest that why they are technically pro business. What matters is that they would leave the jew corporations and banks in place.
And im pretty sure BTW that all southern evangelicals are rabid zionists too, that is just common sense to assume.
And as I noted earlier, the shabbath-goyim of theirs would remain in positions of power and influence, bc you dont even have a fucking slightest clue to deal with them, nor would the states’ legislators of the future.
By exactly leaving the columns of jew power in place. Banks, corporations, newspapers, porn, MTV, consumerism. You dont even know what half of these issues mean, lest anything to do about them.
“Jewish interference in our culture comes down at us through federal policies and unpopular court decisions.”
Jewish interference comes through media, banking, porn, MTV, consumerist propaganda. Failure to even acknowledge these reveals, that you are a shill.
Brad G. is a shill.
Re: European Light
Pop quiz:
In the South, how did we get abolition, affirmative action, civil rights, integration, abortion, pornography, feminism, free love, interracial marriage, legalized sodomy, open borders, multiculturalism, and now gay marriage? If you answered it is because “Da JOOZ” brainwashed us with TV, you are historically mistaken. No, every single one of those things was imposed on the South, through the existence of the Union, with federal troops in the case of abolition and integration, federal court orders in the case of abortion, interracial marriage, pornography, sodomy, and gay marriage, or acts of Congress in the case of Third World immigration, which the South voted down in 1965 and every time it has come up since then.
Isn’t it true that every Southern state used to be segregated? Isn’t it true that interracial marriage was banned in every Southern state? Isn’t it true that gay marriage was banned in every Southern state? Now, did we impose abolition on ourselves? Did we impose the Civil Rights Act of 1964 on ourselves? Did we open the borders by voting for the Immigration Act of 1965? How about Roe v. Wade? Did we listen to the Jewish media and decide, hey y’all, that’s such a great idea, we ought to have abortion here in Alabama and Mississippi? How about “gay marriage”? Did Texas legalize gay marriage by itself?
The “column” of Jewish power is leverage over the federal government, which has usurped all the power from the states, and which micromanages every aspect of the economy, and which is now in the business of achieving “racial balance” in residential neighborhoods. Yes, it is true that Jews control The New York Times, but so what? It doesn’t follow that White people in Tennessee are brainwashed by Paul Krugman or Maureen Dowd columns.
10 percent of Americans and 12 percent of Americans have a “great deal” of confidence in television news and the newspapers
http://www.gallup.com/poll/1597/confidence-institutions.aspx
“Gay marriage” is an example of a systemic problem, that being, the system can’t be reformed because federal courts, federal bureaucrats, Congress, and the president make every decision of any importance now because power is concentrated at the top in Washington and radiates outward to the provinces.
Did the Jews convince us to impose gay marriage on ourselves in Alabama, or is this yet another case of an order from the top down like integration, interracial marriage, abortion, and open borders before it?
Their economic and cultural influence is protected under the present system by, let’s see, the US Constitution, Supreme Court precedent, federal law and sacrosanct individual rights, property rights, and “civil rights,” not to mention “hate crimes” legislation, which no state or lower legislative body interfere with.
Here’s the way these things always go: the federal government announces some new innovation, say, integration and civil rights, then uses raw force to impose those things on us, and finally resistance collapses and apathy and resignation sets in because power is concentrated in Washington and we have no control over any of it here.
Everything from monetary policy to trade policy to fiscal policy to the tax code to labor and energy regulations to financial regulation to the currency to the banking system to the national debt would be radically transformed by secession. Scotland just had this debate.
Jews would continue to represent the Northern and Western states in the US Congress because the people who live there elect them. That’s why Minnesota has a Jewish senator and Vermont has a Jewish governor, but Alabama and Tennessee do not.
ALL of those things are regulated by the federal government. Every single one of them. In every single case, it is Washington that sets the rules. Dump Washington and in one stroke there is a reset on all of those issues.
ALL of which are regulated and protected from interference by … the federal government.
Chemtrails might explain why Alex hasn’t been seen in public in 7 years.
HW: “Is that due to Jews or his own choices?”
How come your country is invaded by non-whites?
Is it the will of the people? If not, whose fault is it?
Listen to this crank:
If by the Jews you mean the SPLC and ADL, they attack us all the time. But so what? Why would a Jew crying out in pain in a blog post, you’re a raaaacist, stop anyone from doing what they want to do? If you are afraid of being called a name in a blog post, is the problem the Jew that calls you a name, or is it that you respond to the accusation by acting like a pussy?
The Jews aren’t stopping Linder or anyone else from doing whatever it is that they want to do. Linder sits in his house because that is his choice. To be fair, I will grant that his illness has a lot to do with it, but what’s your excuse?
Do you know of any other movement where everyone sits in their own house all day and plays around on the internet?
Re: Alex Linder
After the Jew has been named and identified (does it take 14 years to do this?) as a negative influence, what then?
If Jews are as bad as you say, why is your response to that problem to sit in your house … for the last seven years?
Let’s assume the Jew has been named. What then? What do you do after you have named them? Sit in your house and name them some more?
Quite honestly, I don’t see what sitting in your house arguing with people on the internet for seven years does to address the problem.
I heard you the first time, years ago!
Naming the Jew is basically an exercise in problem identification. WNsts name the Jew for the same reason SNsts “name” the federal government. That’s how I shake out on it.
Dodging the the Jewish question with the Yankee question has one small problem: Do you really think that if the Confederacy had broken free that your people would have a different fate today than the rest of the white world, which is all on the same Jew-programmed march to extinction regardless of the side it took in the American Civil War?
I guess the best answer to the question “Why name the Jew?” is: for the very reason you are afraid to.
Absolutely.
1.) The Jew is named here all the time and has been for years now. I don’t really care. The sun will rise tomorrow. I’m used to that too.
2.) If you want to contribute something substantial that might advance this debate, I suggest focusing more on what happens after the Jew has been named. What do people who aware of the Jew do next?
3.) Yankee-Judea took over leadership of the “free world” after WW2 – a Confederate triumph would have changed the course of world history.
People who are aware of the Jewish question arrange their personal and political affairs accordingly. What are you doing to prevent Southern Nationalism or the CofCC from being subverted and neutralized by Jews, assuming that they have not been already?
It is interesting to watch how the BUGS movement has become increasingly strident about avoiding any talk of the Jewish problem. I suspect that they have been infiltrated and compromised. Any movement or organization that does not entirely exclude Jews will be taken over by them and subverted in the end — provided, of course, they do any good for our people in the first place.
Re: Greg
1.) Most people who are aware of the Jews are hiding out on the internet. There are a handful of exceptions to the rule like Parrott and Heimbach.
2.) It’s not a problem because there are no Jews trying to subvert the League or CofCC. Jewish subversion happens on the internet where trolls are allowed to run wild on places like VNN Forum.
http://www.commondreams.org/hambaconeggs
3.) If so, BUGS is proof that online discussion forums are easier to subvert than real world organizations.
Interesting that Canada successfully repelled the Yankee invaders and maintained her sovereignty, yet today that country is on the same march to oblivion as the rest of the white world. What makes you think that an independent Confederacy would have avoided the same fate?
Canada was protected from invasion by Britain which was the superpower of the 19C, and now Canada is under US hegemony like the rest of the NATO countries.
BUGS is like any real world organization: anything centralized and hierarchical can be subverted from the top.
RE: Brad G.
Every single one of my questions were met with the descriptions of the present system, of which I ‘ve been thoroughly familiar with already. I couldn’t care less about hearing them again and again.
When I ask you: how the seceded states would deal with the jews and shabbath-goyim deeply entrenched in power positions in banking (jewish banks are all around the country, so they are all around the South too), media (same, jew-owned TV-stations all around), porn-industry, MTV and consumerist propaganda, describing the present situation is AVOIDING THE ANSWER.
You have avoided to answer everything I asked. That is extremely dishonest and cause to suspicion.
The most ‘specific’ answer I could get was that
This is simply false, “Scotland ” (Or the SNP) wanted to keep the Queen, the Pound and the Bank of England as a regulator of monetary activity all along. There was no serious debate over this issue.
BTW, “radical transformation” is a two-way road. Things can pretty quickly “radically transform” to the worse as well. Your choice of words is quite telling.
Your answer that “Secession would be the magic bullet that would solve all and every single one of the South’s problems”, is very, very false to assume.
see this:
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/mccarthy/secession-is-not-a-principle-of-liberty/
This article exposes quite a number of problems that you have to failed to adress so far. I asked you at least once to provide answers for this exact same article, and you have miserably failed to do so.
What would guarantee that the states’ legislators would want to change these, instead of just leaving the status quo in effect? One more thing: how would they deal with the jew money power deeply entrenched in Southern financial institutions, corporations and media-outlets? How would they deal with the shit flowing from the TalmudVision?
As far as I know, America was always based on “free enterprise”, “no interference in private business” and shit like that. If you strike down jewish power, that is a violation of these rights. I’m sure it is totally obvious to everyone who is American.
Your promises are vague and empty; your only method is to wave the snake-oil remedy of a seceded South flowing with milk and honey and free from jew influence.
That is utterly, ridiculously false to assume.
I seriously cannot decide whether you are a shill or snake-oil salesman.
Seriously, Greg? It could also be said that those who have a fixation and obvious obsessive compulsive outlook toward Jews will always find a way to connect The Jewish Question to anything they deem as a negative in society or in their own personal lives. Name an affliction of society or problem in the world and someone like David Duke will almost always try like crazy(literally, in my opinion) to center it around The Jewish Question.
This obsessive characteristic is why you go on to say “I suspect that they have been infiltrated and compromised ” when a group or person isn’t as driven by mania as what is considered the “normal” amount of fixation on Jews. What is normal? It’s always a devolution of critical analysis by contorting yourself and your views to the lowest common denominator — which, for some strange reason, is always centered around Jews.
Your 50% you dedicate specifically to The Jewish Question isn’t enough for the guy spending 60% of his time. The notion is that he is more awakened and serious than you, and less susceptible to becoming a vehicle for those rascally Jews. In turn, that guy is looked at suspiciously by the guy spending 70% of his time… and that guys is looked at suspiciously by the guy spending 80%… and that guy is looked at suspiciously by the guy spending 90%… until — I’m sure you know what’s coming next — what you end up with is a vacuum where the only correct answer all along was 100% of your time dedicated to the question. Deviate from this path in any way and it will be said that you are being controlled by Jews and attempting to take 100% all the way down to 0%. It was all just a rhetorical question within a rhetorical question that was never intended for critical analysis.
This ridiculous omnipotence attached to Jews is nothing but a convenient excuse to make perennial losers, loons, deadbeats, faux intellectuals and control freaks feel good about themselves and the direction their lives have taken.
For those who want to know what makes the South different, please read about our history and culture (not Hollywood “redneck” culture, true Southern culture). It took the National Guard being Federalized by Kennedy to enforce integration for a reason. Even today, we have set up our own immigration laws only to be struck down by…..Federal judges. The Southern people, religiously and culturally, would instinctively correct all the Federal wrongs done to us.
BUGS is comprised of anonymous people who post the Mantra.
BUGS is, at core, a group of people who know one another in the real world. And, given the recent trend of their movement, I have reason to wonder if one of them is now a Jew, or sleeping with a Jew, or working for Jews.
Jews were subverting societies and organizations long before the internet came along.
Jews can pretend to be anyone under the cloak of anonymity on the internet:
http://www.commondreams.org/hambaconeggs
VNN Forum was infiltrated for years by a Jewish troll who was trying to make anti-Semitism sound as ridiculous as possible. As for BUGS, whenever I go over there, I see a bunch of anonymous people interacting with each other. I know of only a handful of them in the real world (Horus, Whitaker). Why do you say they know each other in the real world? I’ve never heard of BUGS having any real world meetings.
Re: European Light
Obviously not.
If that was the case, you would be able to cite an example of social revolution (integration, interracial marriage, gay marriage, open borders, etc.) that wasn’t imposed on the South by the federal government, but was instead adopted wholly on account of the Jewsmedia brainwashing us (like the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which we voted down 9 to 1), as per your theory.
I’ve already pointed out to you that the banking system is regulated by Congress and is controlled by the US Treasury and Federal Reserve. I’ve already pointed out to you that the media – and its present state of consolidation – is regulated by the FCC under the US Constitution. I’ve already pointed out to you that pornography is controlled by the First Amendment and Supreme Court precedent. Consumerist propaganda is protected as free speech under Supreme Court precedent.
How are we supposed to do anything about these things without our own government? The truth is that we can’t. The society and culture that we have today is the logical outcome of how the system we have now – liberal capitalist democracy – has unfolded under its own rules. Jewish free speech and private property rights are sacrosanct under the present liberal system.
My answer is simply that the federal government controls all of those things, and without our own government, we can’t do anything about them. That’s why I am focused on secession for we can organize our own government!
Just the opposite is true: the myriad ways that secession would affect Scotland’s economy – whether it was oil revenues, taxation, NHS spending cuts, EU membership, the Bank of England, and sharing the pound as a currency with England dominated the debate, and it was concerns over those issues that torpedoed Scottish independence by scaring enough old people to vote against it.
Secession is a radical transformation because it necessarily entails breaking with the present constitutional regime. It means that all kinds of issues – trade policy, fiscal policy, monetary policy, regulation of the banking system, energy policy, healthcare, etc. – every single bit of it has to go through a reset.
Yes, instead of dealing with pornography or open borders or gay marriage or media consolidation, and so on, as separate issues, secession in one stroke addresses all of those issues by taking out the central government where power is consolidated and all decision of any importance in our society are made and sent from the top down the chain to the administrative units that we call states, cities, and counties.
I don’t read The American Conservative or care what is said there. I haven’t read that website in years since Buchanan and Taki cut ties with it.
The “status quo” is determined by a tug of war within the Union – see, for instance, amnesty for illegal aliens – between the South and the Northeast/West Coast. The tug of war would come to end after secession.
1.) First, there’s nothing we can do about TalmudVision under the present system because all the shit that is pumped out of there is regulated by the FCC and protected by the First Amendment and Supreme Court precedent. Nothing short of ditching the present liberal system with holds Jewish private property rights, individual rights, civil rights, and free speech to be absolutely sacrosanct will suffice to change that.
2.) Second, if this debate is to progress, you need to specifically name the Southern financial institutions that you have in mind.
3.) Third, you need to specifically name the Jew corporations that are bad, and elaborate beyond your refrain that “the corporations are acting all corporationy!”
Duh!
We know! That’s why the federal government and its ground rules which are based upon Americanism has to be the first thing to go.
I’ve explained how the Jews influence our society – 82 percent of them don’t live here, they don’t have much of a regional power base here, so that requires them to impose their social agenda – see Bloomberg’s push for gun control, that’s one example – on us through the federal government.
As I pointed out to you in the last comment, 10 percent and 12 percent of Americans hold television news and newspapers in high regard, so you are exaggerating when you peddle your theory that the Jewsmedia is brainwashing us. Among other things, that can’t explain why Southerners voted 9 to 1 against the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and how federal troops had to be used to impose integration.
My worldview is based on a thorough familiarity with our history. All this shit is imposed on us because of the existence of the Union. It has been that way since beginning. The South is best understood as a peripheral colony of Yankee-Judea (its center of gravity is the New York metro area) which is the cultural symbiosis of Yankees and the largest concentration of Jews in the world outside Israel combined with an all powerful consolidated and unfettered central government.
Greg Johnson says:
October 23, 2014 at 4:57 pm
“BUGS is, at core, a group of people who know one another in the real world. And, given the recent trend of their movement, I have reason to wonder if one of them is now a Jew, or sleeping with a Jew, or working for Jews.”
If there is infiltration as sophisticated as that, its because they are seen as a credible threat.
What trend are you referring to? They have always focused on White Genocide and only White Genocide. Bob’s policy has always been if you want to name Jews then go do it, but you do not get to screw up His Work, because in his experience, he doesn’t think naming Jews works.
This is where he explains his view on allying with Jews:
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2006/08/04/why-we-cant-ally-with-jews/
And what those who want to name Jews should do:
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2014/10/04/discipline-of-the-roman-legions/
Bob Whitaker is not a Jared Taylor and he is not a David Duke. He does not deny Jews exist, but the fight with them is on a different battlefield. Bob’s battle front is Whites who are anti-White. He is not going to abandon his front and fight your battles for you. That is your job.
Something I have noticed about the name Jews WN, I have never seen pictures of them outside their houses, holding up “Its the Jews” signs. So what’s up with that? They tell us its so important, but they refuse to do it themselves. So why are we taking these people seriously?
This advice applies to you Hunter: Your blog was great when you were posting pictures of your group, actually doing something, but that seems to have slowed down. Now you are arguing with intellectuals on the internet, about other intellectuals arguing with each other on the internet. Stop obsessing over your neighbor’s business and focus on your battlefront.
My theory is that “naming the Jew” is the perfect activity for slacktivists: it can be done safely and anonymously, at no cost and with little risk, in the comfort of one’s own home, without ever having to make any kind of sacrifice or take a public stand against the Jews.
If they were serious about addressing the problem, there would be a simple answer to my question: after the Jew is named, what then? William Pierce at least had an answer: the point of naming the Jew for Pierce was to raise consciousness of the problem, and the solution was to join his organization and network and pool resources with other likeminded people in order to confront the problem and try to do something about it.
What does “naming the Jew” lead to today? It leads right back to “naming the Jew” – after Step 1, proceed to Step 1. It is circular feedback loop, and it gets some people so angry and so frustrated that they end up self detonating like Glenn Miller. Think about it: if the Jews are as bad as these people say they are, why are they never, or only rarely, seen in public outside their own house?
We see Robert Ransdell and Jimmy Marr, but they are almost always by themselves. We see them because those two are unusually courageous and not as lazy as people like Linder or Varg who has been never seen in public because he is a physical coward.
Celestial Time says:
‘Seriously, Greg? It could also be said that those who have a fixation and obvious obsessive compulsive outlook toward Jews will always find a way to connect The Jewish Question to anything they deem as a negative in society or in their own personal lives. Name an affliction of society or problem in the world and someone like David Duke will almost always try like crazy(literally, in my opinion) to center it around The Jewish Question.’
Why do you always come back to that idea that jew critics, David Duke in particular are always -trying- to find a way to connect jews to societies problems?
They do not have to find a way or make stuff up. They point out the obvious. It’s literally out in the open. No need to concoct elaborate schemes or play pin the tail on the wrong donkey.
I just spent some time at David Dukes blog. Yes, there are plenty of news stories and articles pertaining to jews.
Can you show many instances or even one where he -tries- connecting dots or where he falsifies information?
He doesn’t insert jews into stories, fabricate scenarios or photo shop them into pictures where none are to be found.
Instead of claiming he is obsessive or wrong can you show us where DD is lying or misleading his readers?
Brad darling, enlighten us all. What is it you do for a living? Who’s paying the bills…for Renee, Geordie?
Really, show us all how it’s done, Oh Courageous One.
And your assertion that ‘Yankee Judeo’ somehow caused the trainwreck is so warped I don’t know where to start. Who are the main christian zionists? Southerners. Who planted LBJ? Southerners. Whose state offers an israeli license plate? Some southern one. Whose region teaches that jews are the Chosen People? Southerners.’ Etc. etc.
Haven’t read most of this yet, but it seems apropos, on Southern Jews called Two Covenants:
http://books.google.com/books?id=EzR13rJBwc4C&pg=PA134&lpg=PA134&dq=is+author+john+berendt+jewish&source=bl&ots=86tWMS0lNh&sig=6xJ7GSwCv2a-DKFdscSYPRxz3CI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=FVgrVLjbGMaKyASq-ICACg&ved=0CD8Q6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=is%20author%20john%20berendt%20jewish&f=false
Sam,
I think the criticism is that there is a tendency to want to make the Jewish angle of any issue the most important angle – not uncommonly to the exclusion of all else. If you doubt this occurs, ask yourself why so many people seem to get the impression that it does? Personally I think too much is made of the tendency to implicate Jewish influence – ie, it doesn’t dominate WN to nearly the extent that some critics charge – but there are days when even I think to myself some WNs won’t be satisfied until every sentence begins and ends with “I renounce the Jew and all his works.”
Because his(as well as others) entire existence revolves around Jews, not actually helping White people. His big contribution to White people is to swoop in when he hears the faint sounds of a piggy bank being broken open and then talk about Jews. That’s it.
You, ironically, are being somewhat misleading when you say you went to his website and saw plenty of news stories about Jews. Of course you saw plenty of stories, because it’s all about Jews. How could you not see anything but Jews when the entire premise of the site is to focus on finding Jews in every nook and cranny of the world?
In what way would I have to prove someone wrong about their fixation when I say that their obsessiveness is counterproductive and comes far too close to skirting a type of mental illness? I abhor organized religion and could probably type out a 500,000 word essay on the ways that religion has preyed upon society, stymied creativity, and created an intellectually inferior and easily manipulated people. I could write day after day for the next five decades. I could give you example after example. But after a certain point it would become less about me trying to root out facts and truth and more about me trying to shape a premise in order to make a career out of it.
David Duke is in it for David Duke. He’s an egotist who hides his own inadequacies and vices behind a great big wall of Jews. Call into question his motives, methods or the way in which he begs for support, he will insinuate that you are being led around by Jews or have been heavily influenced by them. I’ve seen him do this many different times on Stormfront and other places as well. Is it a kind of tragic irony when it can be said that without Jews there is no David Duke? Hell, most Nazi officials had more to define themselves with than David Duke. He’s a one trick pony.
Silver says:
‘I think the criticism is that there is a tendency to want to make the Jewish angle of any issue the most important angle – not uncommonly to the exclusion of all else.’
I don’t deny the existence of other angles and have frequently placed blame on other groups and organizations much to the dismay of several O.D. members.
However, the jews are enemy #1. The unseen hand behind the scenes, the catalyst, the straw that stirs the drink etc.
‘If you doubt this occurs, ask yourself why so many people seem to get the impression that it does? ‘
Because any criticism whatsoever of jews is considered by the vast majority of brainwashed goyim to be ANTI-SEMITIC! It’s branded in their brains. We can throw dirt on everyone and everything, but the only thing they will remember is that you once said jew – not ‘Jewish’ person and didn’t bother to genuflect or bow the head.
I had dinner with a very angry relative ( Tea Party member) the other day who brought up the I.R.S. scandal involving the targeting of conservative groups and the blatant destruction of evidence in hard drives.
She was at the point of tears and totally disgusted that Lois Lerner was pretty much allowed to give us the finger and walk away virtually unscathed.
Poor thing was confused, searching for answers and frightened about the future of this country.
I offered an explanation as to why, but she suddenly shifted gears and went on a rant about Ebola and the idiots in charge who could get us all killed.
I let her vent a while then simply informed her that the I.R.S. director Lois Lerner, U.S. (CDC) Director Thomas Frieden and newly appointed Czar Ron Klain all are jews and we should start from there.
I got the eye roll thing and here we go again look. Ha ha.
Next time I’ll absolve jews and bring the hammer down on a wide assortment of liberals, lefty radicals, anti-American subversives, distributionists, greedy government employees, Obama, Rinos, atheists and the um, er, Hungarian fella, George Soros.
That will get me out of her dog house, for sure.
HW: “after the Jew is named, what then?”
The Jews are responsible both for race-replacement and for banning free-speech in the media and the administration so as to silence the resistance. They depend on treacherous, stupid or crazy White people to finance and implement the race-replacement of White people. That’s why naming the Jew is crucial.
Once the information spreads and people start speaking freely and openly about the Jewish program to destroy White nations, it will become harder for Jews to enlist White cooperation. That seems obvious.
You say it’s no use naming the Jew continually. It isn’t clear if what you have in mind is the White Nationalist sphere or the world at large. Most people outside the nationalist sphere have no clue about the Jewish problem, and most of those who know a little about the problem have no idea it is crucial to the collective survival of White people. When they come across someone like Robert Ransdell or Jimmy Marr, the message they get is completely new to them. As for the commenters on American WN internet forums, most of them don’t really think that mass-immigration is due to the Jews (or would stop if not for the Jews). And it looks like you don’t believe that yourself.
You keep asking what must be done after the Jew has been named. It would make more sense to ask what can be done in the interval after the Negro and the Mexican have been named and before the Jew has been named. I think we are presently in that situation. Most people, both among WNs and in the general population already know about the Black problem and don’t want to be replaced by Mexicans. What to do next? You cannot, with the help of your friends, fill an autobus with Mexican immigrants and send it back to Mexico. Maybe you could decide, for example, to petition the government. Unfortunately, the government is a soft dictatorship largely run by Jews, and they don’t care about petitions. You could try to use the newspapers and television stations to put pressure on the government… Alas, the Jews own the media.
There’s more to do than name the Jew, but the Jew should be named all the time.