Cuckservatives: Paul Ryan, Jack Kemp Republican, Addresses Conservative Policy Summit

Read the whole thing … before you get past the first paragraph, you will see why Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan lost the 2012 election:

“Thank you very much. I want to thank Mike and everyone at Heritage Action for hosting us today. These are the kinds of conversations we need to be having. These are the kinds of conversations we were having when I was working for Jack Kemp at Empower America. That’s how House Republicans put together the Contract with America.

“I’m a Jack Kemp, Ronald Reagan conservative. They both understood we need to be talking about what our vision is and how we can make it a reality. We need to raise our gaze. That’s how you move America forward. And that’s what I want to talk to you about. …

Frankly, that’s letting the president define us. That’s what he wants us to do. That’s defining ourselves as an opposition party, instead of a proposition party. …

“We want your ideas and your input. As far as I’m concerned, if you have ideas, we’re all ears.

“Because the way I see it, that’s how we turn the country around. In the late 1970s, Jack Kemp and House conservatives put out a plan to cut taxes and restore America to her greatness. It was bold and aspirational. It was so compelling that Ronald Reagan ran on those ideas in 1980.

“And what happened? Reagan ran the tables. The Republican party won a mandate from the people, and the rest, as they say, is history. And Mandate for Leadership was a cornerstone of that moment.

“Well, that is exactly what we need to do today. And the stakes are even higher. So we need to be inspirational. We need to be inclusive. We need to show how our principles and policies are universal and how they apply to everybody. …”

But we should not follow the Democrats and play identity politics. Let’s talk to people in ways that unite us and that are unique to America’s founding. That’s what I think people are hungry for. And that really is the essence of the Republican party—or, more importantly, the essence of the conservative movement. And that is our mission for the next six months.”

Because, optimism.

The Gipper is still the president. The bold new conservative agenda that will move America forward in 2016 is the exact same agenda coupled with the exact same boilerplate it was in 1980: more tax cuts, more deregulation, more free-trade, amnesty for illegal aliens, and saber-rattling against Russia. Never mind the fact that the Soviet Union collapsed. Never mind the fact that millions of legal and illegal aliens have moved here. Never mind the fact that American workers are competing with workers in Vietnam and Guatemala because of free-trade. Never mind the fact that our culture has been demolished.

ben sasse red tie

Ben Sasse, the new cuckservative heartthrob from Nebraska, whose Senate campaign was bankrolled by the Club for Growth, had this insight in his speech:

“A lot of what is happening in the Republican electorate right now is the downstream effect of a tribalism of race, class and gender identity politics on the left that some on the right have decided, ‘well if they’re gonna have identity politics, maybe we should have identity politics.’ And that is an abandonment of the American idea. …

The idea that we have a strongman who can save us, isn’t true. And if you pretend that if we gave more power to one guy in Washington, but he was ‘the right guy,’ everything would be fixed, I submit to you that that act is the act of saying that everything is already lost in the American experiment.”

Because, the “American experiment” is MLK’s Dream.

Here’s are the facts: From 1975 to 2012, over half the income growth in the United States went to the top 1 percent of households. Women have entered the workforce en masse to make ends meet. Real wages have stagnated for 35 years. The average White middle class and working class household is poorer in 2016 than it was in 1997. America hasn’t ran a trade surplus since Richard Nixon was president and we are rapidly approaching $20 trillion dollars in debt under “conservative” leadership.

But no one should be “angry” about this or anything like gay marriage. These libertarian autists, who believe the real world operates like an Ayn Rand novel, assure us that everything will be fine. All we have to do is nominate Marco Rubio to grin his way to the White House so he can take on the Russian threat and make life easier for hardworking New York hedge fund managers who practice the virtue of selfishness.

Once again, I know that I will take heat for saying it, but these cucks are why so many White Millennials are supporting Bernie Sanders.

cruz-evangelican

BTW, take a look at this at National Review. After Ted Cruz won Iowa by thumping the Bible and touting values, abortion, muh values, and abortion to gullible Evangelical voters and making a fool out of himself with Phil Robertson and Glenn Beck, National Review interpreted the election as a huge victory for principled free-market economics and is having yet another orgasm over ethanol subsidies.


About Hunter Wallace 11763 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent

37 Comments

    • Denise,

      All I can say is that I understand why White Millennials are supporting Sanders. It is largely because of the economic policies of these dumb autistic cucks like Paul Ryan and Ben Sasse.

      • The millenial socialist is seeing about 90% of the con job but misses the other 10%. By the time they see with their own eyes they are 30-35 and will simply decide to work like hell to find a refuge in the burbs.

      • Hunter – I KNOW why the deliberately, tragically mis-educated and mis-directed MilleniCucks support Sanders. He’s promising a higher level of GibsMeDat for young Whites, and Young Whitishes.
        “Muh Free College”.
        A 13 year old OUGHT to be able to figure out that this is an outrageous lie. Who is going to PAY for “muh free college”? NOTHING is free. Who will pay the extremely plush salaries of the tenured proffs, and executive level administrators? Who will pay the salaries of the associates teachers, and lower level secretarial staff? Who will pay for the maintenance and security staff? Will they all work for free? Who will pay for research, and research universities? Who will PAY for the ELECTRICITY?
        Then let’s address the same questions regarding “free” healthcare, shall we?
        NOTHING is “free”.
        Who DOESN’T know that?
        Do you think I am supporting the “right-wing” Race Traitors and Cucks?

        • I ran the numbers last year.

          If we weren’t paying for the healthcare of wounded warriors in Iraq or giving obscene tax cuts to the wealthy, we could easily have free college tuition in the United States. You act like this is a radical proposal but Germany already does this.

          • I agree 100% about paying for the effects of the Jew Wars. So you have to stop the Jew Wars. I’m all for that. You also have to agree to rescind the tax cuts to the obscenely wealthy. There won’t be ANY problem with that, right? You can ALSO stop “foreign aid”. Bernie will be down with THAT, especially with cutting off “our only ally in the Middle East”, right?
            FYI – I can provide you with a phone number of some-one who has lived IN Germany, and knows how the “free education” system actually works, on the ground. It is NOT “universal university education”. Students are HAND PICKED according to how well they will serve The State. Your previous academic record isn’t as important as you malleability. Hardly ANY-ONE gets in. It’s even worse, now. You must have my private email addy. I’ll be happy to provide you a phone number.

          • “You also have to agree to rescind the tax cuts to the obscenely wealthy.”

            Sure.

            “You can ALSO stop “foreign aid”. Bernie will be down with THAT,
            especially with cutting off “our only ally in the Middle East”, right?”

            Why would we do that when the relatively small amounts we’ve paid in foreign aid have actually saved us tremendously in the long-run, avoided wars, and have bought us extraordinary access to foreign government decisions? You don’t really think Pakistan lets us do as we want with drones in their own country because they like us, right?

            Egypt before we started giving them a relatively paltry $2-3 billion per year (10 times less than NASA’s annual budget): constantly warred with Israel forcing us to rush aid to the Israelis, shut down the Suez Canal, backed radical crazies, and brought us close to nuclear war with the Soviets.

            Egypt after we started giving them a relatively paltry $2-3 billion per year: hasn’t started one war since nor closed the Suez or allied with the Russians AND they get along with Israel — in other words, Egypt is now our bitch in the region….all for a small fraction of NASA’s budget.

            “FYI – I can provide you with a phone number of some-one who has lived
            IN Germany, and knows how the “free education” system actually works, on
            the ground.”

            Unless you have actually lived in Germany yourself, I will assume that you don’t know what you’re talking about…so you can keep your phone number.

            “Students are HAND PICKED according to how well they will serve The State. Your previous academic record isn’t as important as you
            malleability. Hardly ANY-ONE gets in.”

            First of all, that’s bullshit. You are NOT picked according to how well you “serve the state.” That’s crazy. Please call up your buddy and have him explain exactly how the Germans would determine who has “served the state” so I can point out how you have distorted their actual admissions criteria (“serve the state” probably means not having a criminal record, etc…all perfectly reasonable). Please, call him up and post it here if you’ve got the number.

            Second, the German system is similar to what we used to have here (as your own statement indicates): the cognitively superior go to a good university for a relatively low price – a price not bid up by having everyone admitted. Everyone else goes to trade school. What exactly is wrong with that?

            Even with full tuition scholarships, most students still take out grants and loans due to the cost of living. So, that option doesn’t entirely work, either. How about we just cancel most athletic scholarships and affirmative action spots (thereby lowering competition), then subsidize (i.e. make free) college for those who are there based upon merit?

          • You’re talking like a liberal, who thinks there’s just a big pot of money somewhere and that the argument is about how it’s to be spent. That’s not what it is at all: “free” stuff destroys wealth; it renders “price” meaningless. Whether a particular military action, such as ours in Iraq, is ill-advised, the military itself, however big or small, is legitimate, a part of governance. “Free” medical care, free school—free ANYTHING that prevents a person from not spending—destroys wealth. That’s what wealth, property, is: the right NOT TO SPEND. That’s how the government destroys, that’s what socialism is: the violation of that right. What was the argument by which the Supreme Court justified Obamacare? It’s a “tax”; it’s something the government has a right to impose because each person has to pay his fair share—fair share of what? Fair share of medical care that the emergency rooms and other medical entities have no choice but to render, because their right NOT TO SPEND, their right to deny care, has been violated. The government passes various laws—such as Medicare, Medicaid, obligatory health-insurance provisions, and the laws that turn emergency rooms into clinics—and then “taxes” everyone, via Obamacare, to pour money into those same programs and activities, via which health is constantly hemorrhaging. What is your response to that? Do you say—as you should—let’s stop the hemorrhaging; let’s eliminate the laws that create the various ruptures through which wealth streams and is lost? No—instead, you do a bit of arithmetic and think you’ve proven something by pointing out that “free college” for everybody would cost less than the Iraq War. Wise or not, our military expenditures, as I’ve said, have nothing at all to do with the subject. Even if the world were in such good shape that we could be pleased with an annual military budget of only One Dollar, “free college” would be objectionable.

          • “You’re talking like a liberal, who thinks there’s just a big pot of
            money somewhere and that the argument is about how it’s to be spent”

            Well, there is. It’s called the tax base. It comes in every year.

            Your types don’t seem to have a problem with endlessly increasing the size of the already bloated military. In any case, it’s people like you – and the types that constantly bitch about taxes and cutting social programs – that cause the alt right to lose. What non-autistic dummy wants to vote for cutting education or privatizing social security?

            “Free” medical care, free school—free ANYTHING that prevents a person from not spending—destroys wealth.”

            That’s right. Every man for himself. Let all the greedy asshats who don’t want to pay taxes advocate for making the poor pay for public education and depend upon the goodwill of their local churches for food and necessities in this great economy produced by tax cuts for the rich, globalist, free-trading morons. Yay, winning strategy there! And it doesn’t “destroy wealth.” It’s an investment that has been returned many fold in tax revenues. It only “destroys” wealth if your last name is Soros, Walton, or Koch.

            “free ANYTHING that prevents a person from not spending—destroys wealth”

            Well, we have a free space program, and it put a man on the moon. We also have a free military that has kept us pretty safe. The free interstate is also pretty good. I guess the Koch brothers and low wagers who fantasize about being rich and not paying taxes could have put that money to better use, right?

            “That’s not what it is at all: “free” stuff destroys wealth; it renders “price” meaningless.”

            That’s only if everything is “free” you moron. Much of the stuff you see around you is subsidized (i.e. partly free) already: passenger jets made by Boeing, food, etc.

            “Even if the world were in such good shape that we could be pleased with
            an annual military budget of only One Dollar, “free college” would be
            objectionable.”

            Only to greedy asshats who don’t want to pay taxes. Perhaps you would be happy with having every road be a toll road, unaffordable public education, and bread lines — but the other 99% of us don’t mind.

            If you want to know why the alt right truly can’t win anything, consult this guy’s comment. No sane person who isn’t autistic thinks this is something worth supporting. All he does is spout nonsense copied from some loony libertarian website. The polls show that the people, however, are on my side.

          • “Well, there is. It’s called the tax base. It comes in every year.”

            No–that was my point. Anytime the government compels exchange or charity, directly or indirectly, it’s not merely collecting money and spending it, as, for instance, it is when it collects taxes and purchases military equipment (for itself). Every moment of your life, you are deciding how NOT to expend yourself. That’s what it is to engage in exchange or gift-giving. The “price” of something is what you have permitted yourself to expend on it. If you are forced to engage in the exchange, “price” is meaningless. That’s why I said to our host, Mr. W., in my original comment, that his arithmetic, in which he compared the price of the Iraq War to the price of “free college” for everyone, was meaningless. As soon as exchange is compelled, the price–such as, in this case, college tutition–is meaningless. It’s meaningless, in other words, to say, for example, that the cost of a college education is X Dollars, so all the government has to do is collect enough dollars to give X Dollars to everyone, for college. The instant the government “pays” for the college, the price–the X–is rendered meaningless. That number–the X–was meaningful only when the person paying had the OPTION NOT TO PAY IT. What is the “price” of a television set? The store that offers the television for sale posts a “price”–the asking price. If you decide NOT TO SPEND that on the television set–if, in other words, you don’t buy it–then there was no price. If the government decides everyone should get a “free television” and does the arithmetic, based on the asking price at a given point in time, then “price” is meaningless.

            “That’s right. Every man for himself.”

            No–it’s each man’s not presuming to make free with the energy of any other man. Since most white men are parasitical by nature, that’s never popular.

            “If you want to know why the alt right truly can’t win … ”

            See preceding paragraph.

    • i wouldn’t be surprised if Sadners frees all the political prisoners AKA negros and spics who because of white privilege and systemic racism were unjustly incarcerated for crimes such as robbery, rape and murder and looses them on us .

  1. Hunter,

    I am always interested in what s working now, what s popular and what s not in the South.

    Is saber ratling , let s go fight the Russians

    Do any Southerners still go for this now?

    I always seem to win, end the argument when I express my interest in making love to beautiful Russian women like Anna Kournikova and instead fighting, killing nasty mountain Muslim jihadists like Osama Bin Ladin.

    But it s still reality that lisping Lindsey graham is still a big player in Southern national defense circles and they are definitely restarting the Cold War against the Russians.

  2. The Republican party is sure stuck in a weird time warp. Its like an old Hammer horror film, Dracula {Reagan}keeps coming back. He never is allowed to stay at rest, some fool always brings him back to haunt us all over again. its going to be like the Greek Dark Age. 500 years from now, they are going to be talking about the golden age of Reagan. I have developed quite a loathing for the whole bunch. I want to pull my hair out every time I hear “tax cuts”. “Free Markets” “The Constitution” etc. Its like a group of lost priests doing rituals, and sacred sayings for a god everybody else has forgotten.

    • Agreed. Reagan was basically senile in his second term. Reagan Conservatives wasted the 1980s fighting our kinsmen the Russians, arming the nastiest mountain Muslim Jihadists in Afghanistan to fight the Russians. How did that turn out?

  3. They had the same platform and promises when I was a kid in the 70’s and 80’s. Now it’s just out dated. They’re a bunch of old men lamenting the demise of their youth and the end of greatest adventure of their lives; the Cold War. Even I watch Red Dawn out of nostalgia for the 80’s, but I got over it, and my hatred for Russia. I got over the Gipper, too. Sadly and pathetically, they haven’t.

    • These cucks are the ideological equivalent of Bruce Jenner, who had a minor bit of stardom in the 1980’s with the queers and the jews (Village People and Valerie Perrine in ‘Can’t stop the Disco’- lol) and now find they are so feminized, they have mentally castrated themselves, just as Brucie has… or is about to do.

      They are aberrations on the face of the planet. THEY ALL NEED TO GO.

      • I remember as a kid in the 70’s when Jenner was on the Wheaties box. Don’t get me wrong, I still feel some nostalgia for those times. But not for the politics.

  4. The full moon has the same effect on the wolfman, as power on these apparatchiks . Their job is to run our sworn enemy, the DC Empire much like the politburo ran the old USSR which is having the same results.

  5. “As far as I’m concerned, if you have ideas, we’re all ears.”

    Well, Ryan got that much correct, at any rate….

    • Like the kid who didn’t do his homework and is hoping someone whispers the answer. Until someone whispers “it’s the Jews, stupid”, then they pretend go deaf and cut their balls off.

  6. Sasse is a TRAITOR. He was in IOWA, influencing the voters NOT to vote for Trump. In Epsicopal parlance, that’s ‘sheep stealing’ on a ‘yuuuuuuge’ order.

    He’s a cucksocker, just like all the rest.

    And, as I noted in an AmRen post, he’s also so damned ignorant, he can’t even get his history straight.

    “…if they’re gonna have identity politics, maybe we should have identity politics.’ And that is an abandonment of the American idea…”

    Really, you ASS? What the HELL is ‘for US and OUR posterity’ to mean, then?
    Arrrrggggh. Corrupt psychopaths to the left and the right of us.

    Trump, 2016
    God wills it, even if Jews seek to overturn the will of God.

  7. Perhaps a strongman can’t save us but a GOP supported anti-White, NWO oligarchy is surely destroying us. If Trump does nothing more than destroy this nest of traitorous cucks that will be enough.

  8. The cucks weak spot is that they never stand up against the Identity politics of the Left, they should thank god the alt right never calls them on this

  9. And the Right never ever looks for the weak spots of the Left, preferring instead to try and be the smartest kid in the class, FAIL.

    And the Right claims to be military geniuses, yeah sure

  10. Trump on politicians. This is why they hate him.
    Katy Tur ?@KatyTurNBC 1h1 hour ago

    “I was going to say they’re full of shit but I won’t…It’s too controversial” – Trump on politicians.

  11. Who said Reagan was the last great American President? Reagan, under the advice of Greenspan and “trickle down economics” was the beginning of the end of America. Reagan in short, was nothing more than a pitchman for a Jewish agenda. All big lies! Of course the Jews will keep repeating that Reagan was great and the sheeple will continue to parrot this nonsense.

    A kike recently commented on a friends Facebook post that Reagan was great and his legacy needs no defense. When I asked the jew to list a few things to support his statement, as usual when Jews are called-out, he did not respond.

    So the next time some bullshitter says “Reagan was great”, ask them exactly why they think that way and make them give you specifics. The devil, or in this case, the jew agenda is in the details.

    Trump appears to have the vision for America. These Jew mouthpieces will of course condemn him, when they should be cheering him. You would think that they would be encouraging the next Republican president to issue tons of executive orders, as Obama has set the precedent to do so with relative impunity.

    • To elaborate slightly, under Reagan, the greedy kikes were made super rich then went out and created a monopoly of world industry, while destroying and looting America. Granted the founding of the Federal Reserve got it started, but Reagan put it on the fast track.

  12. Yeah, let me cut through the crap this weasel shat out. The Proposition is Whites have to give everything to brown turds to make some jew fantasy stink more than it does now. Sorry, Lyin Ryan, we ain’t going there. Judases like you get cut out of this story early. Sticks and stone will break your bones, but I can hit you HARDER.

Comments are closed.