Cuckservatives Celebrate Harriet Tubman Replacing Andrew Jackson On $20 Bill

Here is a small sample of the effeminate virtue-signaling from #TruConservative pundits that unfolded this afternoon on Twitter when the news was announced that Harriet Tubman was replacing Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill:

The pundits who tweeted above write for National Review, RedState, The Federalist, The Week, The Blaze, The Weekly Standard and Commentary.

2012.12.3.Headshot

National Review has published a think-piece:

“Jackson was a major influence in turning the federal government into an engine of partisan patronage, setting the model for client-based governing that the Democratic party in particular has followed ever since. And his demagogy and politics of grievance remain dangers to this day. The Jacksonians are gone from the Democratic party now — Jim Webb was the last man to turn out the lights on his way out — but the Donald Trump phenomenon has underlined the extent to which they are no friend to principled conservatism, any more than Jackson himself was. …”

The Jacksonians “are no friend to principled conservatism” and “his demagogy and politics of grievance remain dangers to this day.” In other words, all those Scots-Irish voters in the South in places like Jacksonville, FL or Jackson County, AL or Jackson, MS are a threat to #TruConservatism. So let’s thumb them in the eye.

maxresdefault

From Leon Wolf of RedState:

“There are so many figures who were central to our great Civil War, both in the military sense (like Grant) and the political sense (like Lincoln). But the Civil War was, at bottom, a spiritual fight. It was won on the battlefields of Shiloh and Gettysburg, but these battles would never have been fought if not for the inspirational figures like Frederick Douglass, John Brown, and Harriet Tubman. Tubman’s character, honor, bravery and ferocity symbolized the plight of the American slave, and her example helped paved the way for the end of the institution.

Even as a resident of Nashville, home of Andrew Jackson, I do not feel angered by his removal from United States currency. I feel Jackson has perhaps been judged unduly harshly by history, as he is often judged by the standards of decency that are prevalent today, rather than by comparison to the standards of decency that prevailed in his day. If Abraham Lincoln were treated this way by history, he would be known today as a virulent racist. But Jackson, unlike some of his other contemporaries, has never been able to shed the stain of the Trail of Tears from his legacy, even though he by all accounts is largely responsible for the shape of the modern Presidency. Certainly, he is less instrumental to the foundation of this nation than was the great Alexander Hamilton. And according to early speculation, he will not be removed altogether from the bill in any case, but merely demoted to the back. …”

Did you know that John Brown is an “inspirational” conservative figure?

james-poulos-conservative

The Federalist is signaling even harder against the Jacksonian populist threat:

“In the name of national unity, it seems obvious that Andrew Jackson should go. The liberal reasons to throw him over are obvious enough. But there is also a raft of reasons why conservative people should sacrifice Old Hickory.

Already, enterprising minds are realizing how fun it would be to cut loose altogether from the hidebound traditionalism of dead presidents and solemn monuments. In the interest of breaking up “the whiteness and straightness of the history most of us grew up with,” New York’s Christopher Bonanos proposes that each bill be made “thematic,” pairing stubbornly persistent presidents with interesting, important, and inclusive figures from throughout American life. As precedent he cites the delightful diversity of bills of yore. …

But even conservatives have justifiable self-interests and right now the best case for booting Jackson is two words long: Donald Trump. Now that many on the Right believe a crass and misguided populism is in real danger of destroying the Republican Party, stripping the populists of Jackson is more than a retaliatory stick in the eye. It is a reminder that if Jackson was bad, at least he was a proper leader in the primal sense, as a military man.

Key to “Jacksonianism”—a point often lost in the present-day melee—is the idea that warriors ought to have a greater say. There’s a principled case for that viewpoint, but it is light years away from today’s pseudo-Jacksonianism. Here conservatives’ self-interest dovetails with the national interest.

Most conservatives will immediately understand there are virtues to a more military society that are not to be found in a merely more militaristic one. Militant populism that comes from people with no military experience is all but guaranteed to be dumb and dangerous in a way warriors are not.

You can see this in our police departments, where veterans in law enforcement are often apt to view their jobs in less theatrical or performative ways than macho civilians playing army on the force. Above all you can see it in the way we turn everything, rhetorically, into an “all-out war”—an absurdity for anyone who has actually seen even minor combat. Imagine how bad Jackson would have been without the discipline of having served.

Conservative, liberal, or neither, ridding the $20 of Jackson ought to pierce the fog of Trumpism—not only by rebuking a populist icon, but by reminding the populists that their militant vitriol is too lacking in martial virtue. In that sense, the proper presidential symbol of a politics more military isn’t hard to find. He’s graced our currency before—from 1971 to 1978, on the silver dollar.

For the good of the country, let’s replace Andrew Jackson with Dwight Eisenhower.”

It is spelled out more clearly here: rebuke the Jacksonian populists who voted for Trump by trashing their hero Andrew Jackson. They’re not #TruConservatives anyway.

About Hunter Wallace 12392 Articles
Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Occidental Dissent

132 Comments

  1. Its so phony. I bet every one of them lives far from any blacks but very well off blacks. These are the people who get misty about Martin Luther King, too, I’m sure. The Civil Rights era failed. It ended in riots across the whole country and most of America is very segregated. God forbid the federal government ever sends armed troops to elementary schools ever again. Who were they going to shoot?

    As far as the Indians go, they WERE savages. I saw a photo on twitter the other day of someone who had been scalped as a child but survived. Skin on his head was sort of patched back together.

  2. Should the Tubman Twenty come out I will be prepared with a stamp that says “Race Replacement Isn’t Just On Money” and there will be a url to one of our websites.

  3. Replacing the first, and I believe only, genuinely populist president on the $20 bill while another is threatening the establishment can’t possibly be a symbolic coincidence can it? Especially when this new populist candidate is popular among working class and nationalist Whites and the replacement on the $20 bill is a symbolic black abolitionist hero to make sure everyone knows which side is supposed to be the good one. And of course the cuckservatives are making sure to signal their allegiance to the system just in case there were any doubts.

    • Andrew Jackson was one of the reasons Lincoln was able to say what he did was justified. When South Carolina nullified the Tariff, which as Vice President Calhoun pointed out was a tax solely upon Dixie, although Jackson didn’t support the tariff, he supported his UNION above the law itself. Congress even gave him power under the Force Bill of 1833 to call up the army and invade South Carolina, and begin arresting her legislators.

      The year before at a celebration of Thomas Jefferson’s Birthday, Jackson had stated, “Our Federal Union it must be Preserved” to which Calhoun responded “The Union — next to our liberty, the most dear!”

      Cassius M. Clay, an abolitionist and Lincoln supporter from Kentucky had advised Lincoln to use Jackson’s farewell address, the Union Speech, to show to the world that the South was wrong.

      Jackson is a hard man to Hate, yet he is also when it comes from our perspective a hard man to Love. He was willing to go to war against the citizens of South Carolina and set aside her duly elected government. John C Calhoun was right.

      • This may be true but it isn’t Jackson’s support of the Union that these people hate about him. Trump is hardly ideal from our point of view either but it isn’t the things we disagree with Trump about that the establishment finds objectionable, it’s what makes him popular with us that scares them.

        • Well as for me, I support replacing all of the Dollar Bills with generic art so we can end this WHO GETS ON WHAT controversy. Look it’s all worthless anyway the USA is almost DOA. Just another nail in the coffin is the Tubman 20. To make it even better, I’d support going back to the Indian Head Penny, Buffalo Nickel, Lady Liberty Dime, Keep Washington, Put Jackson on the Half Dollar and make a Hamilton silver dollar. Itd sure be nice to be rid of “ABE”

          • Another failed state. I just wish most Whites would wise up to this fact. Unfortunately so many still believe. The power of this almost religious devotion is truly sad.

          • Even George Wallace hadn’t crossed the Rubicon in his lifetime and came out and said Screw America, Secede. In fact Wallace went back and sided with the scum in the 70s after a religious conversion. I don’t hold it against him, I think the assassination attempt and his paralyzed state harmed his mind.

            I will give you this example. If I was in any Deep Southern town in 1955 right as the Civil Rights nonsense began and I climbed up a flagpole, jerked down old glory, sprayed her with lighter fluid and burned her I would be beaten down. The point is, even though the flag was the symbol of the court, they couldn’t in 1955 divorce their feelings from WWI or WWII to see reality. There were almost zero people who would be willing to admit, yes the USA is the problem.

            Today we have come back to the truth, the gospel of 1833 is preached again, John C Calhoun has come back to life. We know better

          • I believe the problem is that the natural virtue of patriotism has been misdirected away from the people and land toward the state and it’s ideological basis, perhaps because America is not a real nation and the only thing that unifies it is the state and it’s ideology.

          • This path started all the way back with Andy Jackson and his fanatical devotion to the UNION to which John C Calhoun told him next to our liberties most dear. Calhoun had no blind devotion, he said that the Union existed so long as it protected the people and when it didn’t that Union had to die. Jackson’s unconstitutional view gave rise to Lincoln.

            After the war, every school in the USA North and South began flying American flags and by 1890s pledging loyalty to the flag. Now when i was a boy taking the pledge, I never saw what it really was. That pledge is unconstitutional in the first place as it is pledging BLIND LOYALTY TO A SYMBOL. The American rag is just that, a rag.

            The Confederate Constitution laid out strict parameters for citizenship and other things each state who signed the document pledged to follow. Any state who didnt could be expelled from the Confederacy. Just as it should be.

          • I think it goes back even earlier to the very foundations of the Union, which are based on the ideas of the Enlightenment. A nation has to be based on kinship, not abstract ideology. Obviously a unifying belief system is necessary but it must be based on blood and soil rather than abstract, universal principles.

          • Exactly. The Founders chose the Pennsylvania Model of Ethnic Relgious Diversity for the United States. New England was ethnically and religiously unified and the South was largely only two white ethnics, English and Celts and was somewhat religiously divided, but the English held the purse strings. As time went on, the English Anglican element in Dixie declined and the Celtic Traditional Element took over most of the new states. Still they were relatively united.

            Today only the South remains ethnically identifiable, New England does in isolated areas. However all of the states in the Midwest and west had no identity. Care to tell me what an Ohioan is? Nebraskan? Answer you can’t as they have no identifiable culture, their states were made up of people from the Middle States and Upper South with a New England Aristocracy. See the issue?

          • The whole point of “assimilation” in the US was not to assimilate aliens into a common ethnic identity but to rob us of any ethnic identity at all. Isolated individuals cannot stand against the organized power of corporations and the state.

          • Exactly. A Nazi examination of the United States, you can find it on the Calvin College Website of propoganda. The Nazis said exactly the same thing, no identity with a Half Jewish half Negrified culture

          • Catholic ethnics in the North used to have a strong sense of identity and a lot of political clout but the “Civil Rights” movement and various forms of social engineering drove them out of their ethnic neighbourhoods and dispersed them into the suburbs. That, and subversion of the Church from within, led to a precipitous decline in their political power.

  4. Replacing a great American like Andrew Jackson with a minor character like Tubman in unconscionable.

    • Even better, let’s just take all the people off the money and put 1 5 10 20 on them like play money. I mean when you think about it Fiat Currency is play money.

      • Or put scenes from national parks, like El Capitan from Yosemite and Old Faithful, or landmarks like the Golden Gate Bridge or a Frank Lloyd Wright design or Cape Canaveral.

        • That’s exactly what I think. I am sick and tired of this stupid debate and look at it this way. In 1928 when the present Federal Reserve Notes were issued, George Washington had been dead 129 years, Abe Lincoln 63, Hamilton, 124, Jackson 83, Grant 43 and Franklin 138 years. 1928 was the 100th anniversary of the election of Andrew Jackson. In 1928 the number of Union and Confederate veterans alive were in the hundreds.

          My gr-gr-gr grandfather was born in 1815 and died in 1905. The year he was born, we had won the War of 1812 and James Madison was President, he died the year Teddy Roosevelt entered his full term. The year my grandpa died, Hiram Cronk, the last veteran of the War of 1812 also died.

          Why I am saying this is for this reason. In 1928 these men were still very real to us. General John J. Pershing the hero of WW1 was born in 1860. That year Mr. Buchanan was President and General Winfield Scott was the Commanding General of the US Army, who had seen George Washington face to face as a child. When Pershing entered West Point in 1882 the Commanding General of the US Army was General Sherman.

          On the other hand here in the year 2016 these men are as foreign to us as Voltaire is. Why not just replace them all with art? I mean I wouldn’t like it but in reality it doesn’t mean anything anymore

          • Wright Brothers, Werner Von Braun, Neil Armstrong, Philo Farnrsworth, Lewis and Clark, Borglum, Eero Saarinen, Henry Ford, Hiram Maxim, enrich Fermi ,Mulholland…designers inventors wait oh shiiiiiettttt whitey again.

  5. Look at the bright side. $20.00 was worth a hell of a lot more when Jackson was put on it. Now it’s cheese.

  6. All effeminate, me-too, diversity whores. I hope their movement collapses soon.

    I used to read The American Spectator. I wonder… Nah, I’m not interested enough to look.

    • That was my first thought. To draw a crack pipe in her mouth on the bill with some funny commentary.

  7. I propose that “tubby” (pl: “tubbies”) or “jemmy” (pl: “jemmies”) become the new slang terms for the Tubman $20 bill.

    Man 1: “Hey dude, can you spot me some tubbies? I’m going on a beer run.”

    Man 2: “Sure, dude.”

    The new $20 bill with Tubman’s ugly mug on it is going to be a constant reminder of how unattractive and unfeminine black females are.

  8. Tubman’s scowling Negroid masculine visage and persona supplies the testosterone triggers these Nancy Boi “writers” grotesquely lack.

      • Negro females have zero feminine looks about them. Without their weaves they look exactly like the males of their race.

        • Exception being the mixed-race ones, the full blooded Africans however look completely masculine. I always wonder how hard up the old men must have been back in 1640 or so to have sex with full blooded African women.

          In 1600s Virginia there were like 50 white men to every 1 white woman, so I guess if you were an indentured servant, an African woman would still be a woman. Most of the interracial sex that took place in antebellum times normally took place in this early colonial era, where there was a shortage of white women and it decreased as white women became more common.

          An exception to this being the French in Louisiana, for some reason the Frogs were really attracted to black women.

          • Has anyone pinned down the AA mix of European Ydna and Mdna?

            They say that Slaves were raped or concubines but my sense of it is that the mixed population was most likely or at least half the product of whores shitting out Mulatto children at brothels.

    • I just say if we’re going to redesign money, why not just make it all look like play money? This is an absolute Joke

    • I believe I told you before the enemy was STUPID. They’ve always hated old Hickory for crushing the Rothschild Rodent Guild and their first attempt to counterfeit our currency. If that slimebucket Wilson (guess what he is) hadn’t been blackmailed into allowing the counterfeiters at the Dead Fed, we wouldn’t have had either World War and these stinky rats would be rolling around in filth somewhere in Madagascar I expect. This is perfect. No self-respecting White Man will fight in this Dead American Nightmare.
      Everything is happening as I have foreseen. Soon that thing in the White House will be shot, and we can get this Party started. Expect Trump to be swindled in Cleveland. Cleveland sucks as we all know. That Giant Sucking Sound is the enemy having a last gasp while going Full Retard.

  9. Maybe we should simply put a jar of penut butter on the bill since it seems to be the greatest “invention” that Africans have contributed. How you “invent” a recipe, well…

  10. I have an idea. Why not just take all the Presidents off the bills and just put generic words like ONE FIVE TEN TWENTY like play money? I mean obviously the USA is DOA. Anyway I will be surprised if we see these new bills, this country’s going cashless eventually.

  11. ‘The pundits who tweeted above write for National Review, RedState, The Federalist, The Week, The Blaze, The Weekly Standard and Commentary.’

    Goes without saying.

  12. It’s amazing how “fluid” the cultural views of the establishment right really are.
    As long as you believe in free-trade and middle-eastern adventurism everything else is up for grabs.

  13. I remember back in the 1990’s when I first heard of the Neo-Confederate movement I was turned off of it because at the time some leaders wanted to be “Inclusive.” I thought it was surreal, various Neo-Confederate websites putting up NO KLAN ALLOWED signs. The Sons of Confederate Veterans did this too,

    I was miffed, how could you be Pro-Confederate and Pro-Diversity? i guess to the DiLorenzo crowd these two things could go together as the real emphasis was small government (GAG!) Thank GOD these people are gone and sane heads have taken over the movement. I understood that at first the League of the South had to temper their tone and thats understandable. The thing was tempering the tone wasn’t successful and wisely Dr. Hill has taken a stronger tone.

    I know there is a middle ground and Hunter has wisely figured out how to deliver the message in a civilized way, I respect that.

  14. Now, many of our anti-South enemies call the South a traitor for seceding from the union back in the early 1860’s. However, it was the North who was the traitor. The Constitution did not prohibit secession or slavery. The North betrayed the Constitution and fought an unholy war trying to force the South back into the union and it was Lincoln who was the driving force in this tyranny.

    Plus, the minority of Southerners that owned slaves at that time were not sinning. You will not find any verses in the Bible promoting abolition or condemning slavery. Not one! I have never lost a debate on this point.

    And in fact, there is a scripture in Isaiah that shows that when Christ returns, He will allow regathered Israel to take and possess servants once again (Isaiah
    14:1-3, esp. verse 2). What are all of you holier-than-thou liberal abolitionists going to say then, should you still be living? Will you apologize to the white Southern people for all these put downs and stunts like today of putting a black abolitionist on US currency just to rub it in as you have been doing for the last 150 years?

    God and Christ are not abolitionists!

    • Another thing to bear in mind is the New England Immigrant Aid Company, which met the Constitutional definition of treason. They overthrew the territorial government of Kansas and levelled war against the states of Missouri, Texas, Kentucky, Tennessee and Virginia. They had the full support of the governors of Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, Ohio and Indiana. The last two shielded the guilty parties from extradition and prosecution for murder, arson and sedition. This point is specifically mentioned in the Texas Ordinance of Secession. General Lyon at St. Louis, refused to protect the citizens of western Missouri, or restore the rightful government of Kansas. Had it not been for secession and war, he probably would have been prosecuted. Missouri Federal Marshals were after his associates and John Brown, Reverend Beecher and James Jennison on charges of treason. Ironically, these Federal Marshalls were later branded as outlaws by the Yankee authorities. Most of them became Partisan Rangers. Next time somebody says; ” Who fired the first shot?”, here’s the answer. Furthermore, the NEIAC had the full support of the Northern majority and Northerners inside the Federal Government. General Lyon being and outstanding example.

      • The entire problem in Kansas just like everywhere else stemmed from Thomas Jefferson’s belief that Slavery was a State Issue and that States could regulate it. Jefferson had it outlawed in the Northwest Territory OH IN ILL WIS MICH even before anyone lived there and even proposed outlawing it in all territories in 1784. This was because under the Articles as we were 13 nations, technically states did have the right to outlaw slavery as states were sovereign nations. They also had the power to declare Negroes citizens.

        When the Constitution was written in 1787 it came with this idea that state citizenship was supreme and that states could do whatever they wanted. The evils from the Articles were carried forward. Now taking the Southern idea that slaves were Property, the idea that the Federal Government tasked with regulating interstate commerce could forbid slavery anywhere PERIOD! was a lie. Nor could any state regulate slavery as it was Federally protected. However Thomas Jefferson and others held they could. MISTAKE NUMBER 1

        When our Constitution was passed, Free Negroes were full citizens in MASS,CT RI NH NY NJ PA DEL MD and NC. Only Virginia South Carolina and Georgia recognized them as non citizens, They were also recognized as citizens in the Republic of Vermont, Kentucky and Tennessee territories. It was understood that no further territories would allow Negro citizenship and none did until 1868.

        From 1787 until 1840 every state except NY MASS, VT, NH ME (grandfather clause under Mass law till 1820) amended their citizenship laws. Negroes were either labeled complete full citizens or noncitizens or in the case of NY full citizens if they owned property. Pennsylvania allowed them partial citizenship but after 1838 banned voting. All the other states, Conn, KY TN, MD DE and NC declared Free Negroes non citizens ironically it took NC until 1835 to do this.RI re-legalized Negro Citizenship in 1842

        The problem was this. Although a Negro wasn’t a Federal Citizen, Federal Citizenship didn’t truly exist except for allowing lawsuits in Federal Courts PRE 1868. Negroes could be State Citizens and state citizenship was supreme. DRED SCOTT although rightly finding that as property no state could regulate slavery, it had no enforcement power. States could refuse to follow the USSC until the 14th Amendment.

      • Your statement proved the problem of which I spoke. Although the Federal government in theory could prosecute treason, State Citizenship was supreme. It was almost impossible for law enforcement to cross state boundaries PRE 1868 unless it received permission from the State Government of said state. Missouri’s authority ended at the Missouri line as did every state until 1868 when Federal Citizenship became law and state citizenship was voided. Before 1868 Texas would have been guilty of Unconstitutional behavior for arresting John Wesley Hardin in Florida but the new citizenship law allowed one state to prosecute or arrest someone in another. Now I hate the 14th Amendment with a passion NOT supporting it here, but State Citizenship under the 1787 Constitution which the Confederacy discarded in 1861 was terrible,.

  15. The crazy thing is that Blacks actually believe that Tubman was a significant figure in American history comparable to Andrew Jackson.

    • Negroes are simpletons, they always care for what they see instead of what they have. Thats why a Negro would live in a dirt floor Mississippi Slave shack, but have a brand new Cadillac which he knew he could pay off in 50 years out in front of it.

    • Would the Romans have ever struck a coin commemorating the Spartacus revolt?

  16. All this stuff only reminds me how much I see Jackson as a great American hero. It also reminded me how much I wish Jim Webb would be Trump’s VP.

  17. Master Cucks eagerly showing off their various skill sets, robotic proficiency and wizard-like abilities to condense Cuckery into 140 characters. I’m just guessing here, but I’d wager that Rick Wilson is a 29th degree Cuck.

    Have no fear, they are being watched and graded, and they will be judged.
    Mark 3 22

    • Rick Wilson is the anti-Trump degenerate who asked Ann Coulter if Trump pays her extra for “anal.”

  18. What other disastrous ideas implemented by Obongo to cement his legacy will the cuckservatives praise? The cuck right exists to give its stamp of approval to the ideas the leftist cultural tyrants wish to impose on America.

  19. Let’s see, you have hundreds of violent long knives invading Cherokee land in Georgia looking for gold and furs. You have two solutions, raise a federal army and invade a sovereign state in a time of peace to enforce the law but you have no real authority to do this, You see Georgia has no desire to protect the Cherokee, so you decide, take them west to save them from incursions. So they are taken west to the Indian Territory, they live there in relative peace for the next 60 years until the Oklahoma Territory is being established. When Oklahoma was established, care was made to make sure the Indians didn’t lose land. of course there was corruption but in the long run. it worked.

    Andrew Jackson. butcher of the Cherokee or savior? You be the judge.

      • I will tell you why Whites never did learn to do that. 1 is misplaced altruism and 2 is greed. Why wasn’t the Negro population restricted with Birth Control? Answer in the old days we looked at More Babies=More workers=more consumers. Now this has bit us in the a-

  20. So why do the jews want to get rid of Old Hickory? Not because of the slaves and Indians; the real reason is that he was a populist and a nationalist who killed the Second Bank of the United States. It was the accomplishment that he was most proud of. Just try saying something positive about Jackson (or Huey Long, for that matter) on National Review, and see what the reaction is.

    Of course, they were never going to get rid of Hamilton, for similar reasons. Not only did he establish the First Bank of the United States, but he was a jew:

    https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/biography/Hamilton.html1

    http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/189128/alexander-hamiltons-jewish-connection

    This whole “Maybe we’ll get rid of Hamilton, maybe we’ll get rid of Jackson” was BS from the start, of course. A jew bankster vs. the man who killed the bank, hmm…

    Anyone else notice that there was a NY musical recently called “Hamilton,” where all the Founding Fathers were played by dindus, portraying Hamilton in a positive light? It got a lot of play in the (((MSM))); I guess to let those who were a little slow on the uptake know that Hamilton had the tribe behind him 100%.

    Update: yep, just checked jewpedia for the musical “Hamilton.”
    “In 2015, the US Department of the Treasury announced a redesign the $10 Bill, with plans to replace Hamilton with an unknown female from American History. Because of Hamilton’s surging popularity, due in part as a result of the musical, creators and fans, United States Treasury Secretary (((Jack Lew))) reversed the plans to replace Hamilton’s portrait, instead deciding to replace Andrew Jackson with Harriet Tubman on the $20 Bill.[83]”

    I wonder if there have been any recent plays about Jackson?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloody_Bloody_Andrew_Jackson

    “Bloody Bloody Andrew Jackson is a rock musical with music and lyrics written by Michael Friedman, and a book by its director Alex Timbers. The show is a comedic historical rock musical about the founding of the Democratic Party. It redefines Andrew Jackson, America’s seventh President, as an Emo rock star and focuses on populism, the Indian Removal Act, and his relationship with his wife Rachel.”

    “It redefines Andrew Jackson, America’s seventh President, as an Emo rock star” (WTF?)

    http://www.unz.com/isteve/hamilton-vs-jackson-on-broadway-2010s-bloody-bloody-andrew-jackson/

    “while Hamilton is portrayed in Lin-Manuel Miranda’s hit show as the unquestionable hero of the nearly all nonwhite production of Hamilton, Jackson was seen in Bloody Bloody Andrew Jackson as at best ambivalent … or an “American Hitler.”

    Surprise, goyim!

    Oh, and of course, Miranda is “Puerto Rican.” Looks more like (((Puerto Rican))) in his photo, though…

    Let’s see what joogle says:
    No one straight out says “this guy’s a jew,” but–
    “Mazel tov to Miranda and his bride, and kol hakavod on a joyous and spirited rendition of “To Life.””
    (sang song from “Fiddler on the Roof” to his wife at his wedding)

    http://jewishstandard.timesofisrael.com/fiddler-in-the-heights/#ixzz46Pn2t2Uv

    and:

    In the meantime he is teaming up with Quiara Alegría Hudes, the “In the Heights” book writer, on a musical adaptation of Chaim Potok’s 1972 novel “My Name Is Asher Lev,” about a young Hasidic Jew in New York City who dreams of life as an artist.“It was my favorite book growing up,” Mr. Miranda said.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/08/theater/lin-manuel-miranda-is-rapping-on-alexander-hamilton.html?_r=0

    What about the surname “Miranda?”

    http://www.genealogy.com/forum/surnames/topics/miranda/162/

    Every. Single. Time.

  21. Long, long overdue. Sorry bigots, white men aren’t the only ones who built this country. Harriet Tubman is an excellent choice for many reasons. And
    it is great that she will be on the $20, which is so much more commonly
    used than the $10. That will bring some racist butts to their knees. Here’s hoping that we can somehow find a way to honor Native Americans, in particular, their great warrior chieftains, who fought to the last to save *their* country. I can see some pigs squirming here in disgust. Loving and enjoying it

      • The Knights of the Golden Circle according to some actually became not only the KKK but arms dealers to the American Indians and continued the war against the Union on the frontier, Remember this. the Klan had plenty of operatives in the North, especially in their home base of Cincinnati Ohio. It takes money to arm an army and if Dixie was stone broke, it obviously came from somewhere.

        Custer was one man whose death was not mourned in Virginia nor anywhere in the old Confederacy

        • Calley on the $1, Chivington on the $5, Houston on the $10 and Walker on the $20

          Nits Make Lice!

  22. Having re-readed their quotes I can only laugh at these pitiful cucks. I can no longer take them seriously.

  23. Treasury Jew Jack Lew(insky) puts an escaped porch-monkey on the 20. Replacing alpha-White male Andrew Jackson: Indian-killer, Brit-slayer, scourge of the banksters. REFUSE TO ACCEPT this infamous scrip every time someone tries to pass one on you. Demand 4×5, 2×10, 20×1. As stated elsewhere on this thread, the Heebs/neo-conz hate Jackson because he killed the 2nd National Bank, and by so doing kept White America out of Judeo-debt-slavery for 80 years…until 1913, when Rothschild, Warburg and Co. put over the Third National Bank, alias the “Federal Reserve”. If they insist on passing you this niggerbill, rip it up into very small pieces and leave it on the counter. Symbols matter, and this is a symbol of anti-White genocide

    • The Jews are not going to stop until someone stops them.

      This is the pattern of the last 2000 years.

    • Symbols DO matter!!!

      This country– as it is now culturally and socially– really has no business being the leading country in the world. It leads the developed world in just about every social pathology imaginable. Most of its large cities are zoos. Its population is becoming more Third World by the hour. A miserable decline it will be. The Chinese Century awaits.

  24. That artwork for the new Tubman bill is interesting. She’s got a gun in one hand, and her other hand is outstretched toward you. It’s like she’s holding you up, wanting to rob you of your Harriet Tubman bills.

  25. And upon hear news of this, black people everywhere were heard to ask:

    Who be Harriet Tubmans?

  26. Its natural a country with a third world population, is going to have third worlders on its currency. Next stop Zimbabwe.

  27. There’s no historical proof that Harriet Tubman ever did anything significant. Her life is fiction created by a Jewish novelist.

  28. Outside of cucks, liberals and SJW’s I think this is going to piss a lot of our people off. Time for them to double down.

  29. The best idea is to have the current president and then have a famous landscape, inventor, muscian, architect, explorer, building, event etc depicted on the back. The designs can be regularly switched out like stamps.

  30. 1. Wake up wondering about the degeneracy of transgender bathrooms
    2. Notice Donald Trump “supports” transgender bathrooms
    3. Question support of Trump

    • Eventually it leads to the degeneracy of single toilet rooms and individual shower facilities at schools. Which might not be that bad frankly. These things always lead to slightly more elegant solutions. I don’t really understand why women have swallowed this one. It’s the open salvo on excluding white chicks from affirmative action.

    • He also said he disagrees w/ removing Jackson, and spoke highly of Jackson. Trump NEVER thinks about social issues. All we must do is bombard his Twitter feed w/ dissent about Trannies. He’ll back off.

      • A must. What does the law say? Is this too new of an issue to be in the laws? I was always under the impression that it was illegal, not just immoral for me to enter a women’s’ bathroom except in unusual emergency circumstances (cries for help, etc). Trump should understand that the economic bullying is the real crime, much like the bullying they tried on him when he first started running.

        If it were ever illegal to fire someone for their political / racial views, this war would be over in a day.

Comments are closed.